Twelve tips to virtually operationalize co-creation of educational design.

Co-creation is the active involvement of all stakeholders, including students, in educational design processes to improve the quality of education by embodying inclusivity, transparency and empowerment. Virtual co-creation has the potential to expand the utility of co-creation as an inclusive approach by overcoming challenges regarding the practicality and availability of stakeholders, typically experienced in face-to-face co-creation. Drawing from the literature and our experiences of virtual co-creation activities in different educational contexts, this twelve tips paper provides guidelines on how to effectively operationalize co-creation in a virtual setting. Our proposed three-phased approach (preparation, conduction, follow-up) might help those aiming to virtually co-create courses and programs by involving stakeholders beyond institutes and across borders.

Correction: Using Assessment Design Decision Framework in understanding the impact of rapid transition to remote education on student assessment in health-related colleges: A qualitative study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254444.].

Using Assessment Design Decision Framework in understanding the impact of rapid transition to remote education on student assessment in health-related colleges: A qualitative study.

Maintaining integrity and validity with online assessment is a significant issue that is well documented. Overt policies encouraging educators to adopt e-Learning and implement digital services coupled with the dramatic change in the education system in response to the challenges posed by COVID-19, has furthered the demand for evidence-based approaches for the planning and delivery of assessments. This study employed the Assessment Design Decision Framework (ADDF), a theoretical model that considers key aspects of assessment design, to retrospectively investigate from a multi-stakeholder perspective the assessments implemented following the rapid transition to remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. One-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty and students from the Colleges of Pharmacy, Medicine and Health Sciences. After inductive and deductive thematic analysis three major themes were identified. These reflected on the impact of sudden transition on assessment design and assessment plan; changing assessment environment; and faculty-student assessment related interactions which included feedback. The use of a comprehensive validated framework such as ADDF, to plan assessments can improve validity and credibility of assessments. The strengths of this study lie in the innovative adoption of the ADDF to evaluate assessment design decisions from both an educator and student perspective. Further, the data yielded from this study offers novel validation of the use of ADDF in circumstances necessitating rapid transition, and additionally identifies a need for greater emphasis to be attributed to the significance of timeliness of the various activities that are advocated within the framework.

The Academic Triathlete: Applying Triathlon Training Principles to Guide Academic Success.

INTRODUCTION: Academic faculty are evaluated on their service, teaching, and research performance with the reward of tenure, promotion, and self-fulfillment. Triathletes spend numerous hours building their swim, bike, and run endurance in aspiration of crossing the finish line on race day. Given the workload required for academic and triathlon success, effective time and task management is essential. In this commentary, the authors posit that academic faculty can effectively structure their day-to-day "training" to achieve their career ambitions similarly to how a triathlete structures their training plan in preparation for a race. PERSPECTIVE: Triathlon requires mastery of three disciplines - swimming, biking, and running - each of which requires specific training approaches, skills, and techniques. Likewise, the service, teaching, and research pillars of academia involve planning, development, and application of diverse knowledge, skills, and techniques. The authors apply the fundamental aspects and lessons learned of triathlon training to the planning and execution of faculty academic work. IMPLICATIONS: Through the adaptation of a triathlete training framework to an academic position, the reader will be prepared to cross the finish line and realize their career goals as an academic triathlete.

Global comparison of professional positioning by pharmacy programs towards prospective students.

BACKGROUND: Enrolment of capable prospective students for pharmacy programs is a major priority for the profession. The way in which these students perceive a future career in pharmacy may be dependent on how programs position the profession using recruitment material. OBJECTIVES: Objectives were to determine how top ranked pharmacy programs across 5 countries position the profession to prospective students on website recruitment material and to compare similarities and differences in how programs use speech acts within positioning statements. METHODS: A qualitative, thematic analysis of publicly available online recruitment information extracted from the top 2 ranked English-speaking pharmacy programs (according to 2018 QS rankings) from each of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, and the United States was completed. RESULTS: Three positioning themes were identified: Pharmacists as health professionals and medicines experts; Pharmacists evolving role as care providers; and Pharmacist diversity in careers. Programs used questions, statistics, and carefully selected words to engage readers, backup statements with evidence, and market positioning statements to younger generations. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacy programs position the profession using similar themes but use different strategies to relay positioning messages to prospective students. These findings may have implications for fostering prospective student interest in pharmacy programs.

Pass-Fail Decisions for Borderline Performers After a Summative Objective Structured Clinical Examination.

Objective. To determine what expert assessors value when making pass-fail decisions regarding pharmacy students based on summative data from objective structured clinical examinations (OSCE), and to determine the reliability of these judgments between multiple assessors. Methods. All assessment data from 10 exit-from-degree OSCE stations for seven borderline pharmacy students (determined by standard setting methods) and one control was given to three of eight assessors for review. Assessors determined an overall pass-fail decision based on their perception of graduate competency. Assessors were interviewed to determine their decision-making rationale. Intraclass correlation coefficients were used to calculate reliability between assessor judgments. Results. Expert consensus was achieved for three of the eight students, however, the assessors' decisions did not align with standard-setting results. The reliability of assessors' decisions was poor. Assessors focused on ability to make correct recommendations rather than on gathering information or providing follow-up advice. Global evaluations (including a student's communication skills) rarely influenced the assessors' decision-making. Conclusion. When faced with making pass-fail decisions for borderline students, the assessors focus on evaluating the same competencies in the students but differed in their expected performance levels of these competencies. Pass-fail decisions are primarily based on task-focused components instead of global components (eg, communication skills), despite that global components are weighted the same for scoring purposes.